This entry was posted on Monday, June 2nd, 2008 at 1:50 am and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
I’ve figured that China’s excessively male population will mean war with Russia’s increasingly old population sitting on poorly defended, resource-rich territory. But, I *will* keep holding out for a sexbot peace solution.
I have often wondered whether the mostly-male trend might eventually lead to a proper treatment of females. If there is only one female to every four or five(?) males, the females might no longer be treated as property or as second-class citizens, but instead would be given higher status than the majority. Might be a good thing in the long run. We can hope…
March 5th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
too many males = VERY BIG army. but you can dream about sexbots for now…
March 6th, 2009 at 5:23 am
I’ve figured that China’s excessively male population will mean war with Russia’s increasingly old population sitting on poorly defended, resource-rich territory. But, I *will* keep holding out for a sexbot peace solution.
September 14th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
I have often wondered whether the mostly-male trend might eventually lead to a proper treatment of females. If there is only one female to every four or five(?) males, the females might no longer be treated as property or as second-class citizens, but instead would be given higher status than the majority. Might be a good thing in the long run. We can hope…
January 30th, 2010 at 6:21 pm
Wouldn’t an increasingly single-gender population result in a nation of homosexuals?
NOTE: I am the furthest possible thing from a homophobe.