<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One-Child Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/06/02/one-child-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/06/02/one-child-policy/</link>
	<description>Science, Religion, Death and Taxes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 02:24:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charismatic Enigma</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/06/02/one-child-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4319</link>
		<dc:creator>Charismatic Enigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=128#comment-4319</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t an increasingly single-gender population result in a nation of homosexuals?

NOTE: I am the furthest possible thing from a homophobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t an increasingly single-gender population result in a nation of homosexuals?</p>
<p>NOTE: I am the furthest possible thing from a homophobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gelfling</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/06/02/one-child-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Gelfling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=128#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered whether the mostly-male trend might eventually lead to a proper treatment of females.  If there is only one female to every four or five(?) males, the females might no longer be treated as property or as second-class citizens, but instead would be given higher status than the majority.  Might be a good thing in the long run.  We can hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered whether the mostly-male trend might eventually lead to a proper treatment of females.  If there is only one female to every four or five(?) males, the females might no longer be treated as property or as second-class citizens, but instead would be given higher status than the majority.  Might be a good thing in the long run.  We can hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wellington_grey</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/06/02/one-child-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>wellington_grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=128#comment-410</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve figured that China&#039;s excessively male population will mean war with Russia&#039;s increasingly old population sitting on poorly defended, resource-rich territory.  But, I *will* keep holding out for a sexbot peace solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve figured that China&#8217;s excessively male population will mean war with Russia&#8217;s increasingly old population sitting on poorly defended, resource-rich territory.  But, I *will* keep holding out for a sexbot peace solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2008/06/02/one-child-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=128#comment-411</guid>
		<description>too many males = VERY BIG army. but you can dream about sexbots for now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too many males = VERY BIG army. but you can dream about sexbots for now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
