<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scijacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/</link>
	<description>Science, Religion, Death and Taxes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:47:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charismatic Enigma</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-4323</link>
		<dc:creator>Charismatic Enigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-4323</guid>
		<description>The One Guy is correct. There&#039;s a reason it&#039;s called &quot;faith&quot; and &quot;beliefs&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The One Guy is correct. There&#8217;s a reason it&#8217;s called &#8220;faith&#8221; and &#8220;beliefs&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The One Guy</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>The One Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-709</guid>
		<description>As I read through these archives, I keep running into situations like these, where I already made my point in an earlier strip.  Science and religion are not incompatible; just because some reject science for creationism or the like, doesn&#039;t mean every religious person does!  The core beliefs of Christianity have nothing to do with science, and cannot be proven or disproven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read through these archives, I keep running into situations like these, where I already made my point in an earlier strip.  Science and religion are not incompatible; just because some reject science for creationism or the like, doesn&#8217;t mean every religious person does!  The core beliefs of Christianity have nothing to do with science, and cannot be proven or disproven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-705</guid>
		<description>By running a &quot;CPU burner&quot;, you are generating lots of extra CO2, and thus must be a Republican.  Shame on you, you evil Republican!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By running a &#8220;CPU burner&#8221;, you are generating lots of extra CO2, and thus must be a Republican.  Shame on you, you evil Republican!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeschmoe</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>joeschmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-708</guid>
		<description>How much bandwidth are you using?  These jobs are very CPU intensive, with a small exchange of data.  Now if you were to mirror some torrents...

You might also like FightAIDS@home:
http://fightaidsathome.scripps.edu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much bandwidth are you using?  These jobs are very CPU intensive, with a small exchange of data.  Now if you were to mirror some torrents&#8230;</p>
<p>You might also like FightAIDS@home:<br />
<a href="http://fightaidsathome.scripps.edu" rel="nofollow">http://fightaidsathome.scripps.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GodMustBeDestroyed</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>GodMustBeDestroyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-704</guid>
		<description>This made my day.  I will indeed attempt to do this as soon as I have a chance.

@Gi Correct!

@sert Incorrect!  The issue of &quot;god&quot;&#039;s existence is irrelevant, except for insight as to how much damage religion causes.  Morality has its only provenance in non-belief!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This made my day.  I will indeed attempt to do this as soon as I have a chance.</p>
<p>@Gi Correct!</p>
<p>@sert Incorrect!  The issue of &#8220;god&#8221;&#8217;s existence is irrelevant, except for insight as to how much damage religion causes.  Morality has its only provenance in non-belief!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zmooc</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>zmooc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-707</guid>
		<description>SETI@Home was definately not the oldest. If my memory serves me correctly, the oldest large scale distributed community computing project was the RC5-56-effort that preceeded distributed.net. That was back in 1997 while SETI@Home did not start until 1999.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SETI@Home was definately not the oldest. If my memory serves me correctly, the oldest large scale distributed community computing project was the RC5-56-effort that preceeded distributed.net. That was back in 1997 while SETI@Home did not start until 1999.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed.net" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charismatic Enigma</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Charismatic Enigma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-701</guid>
		<description>sert, I could not possibly have said it better myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sert, I could not possibly have said it better myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sert</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>sert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-703</guid>
		<description>see, Christianity and science arent really conflicting.
the only controversies are the beginning of the universe, the beginning of life, and the existence of a higher being. all of which cant really be proven either way, and shouldnt be a cause for fighting.
the problem comes when one group (of any kind) believes their group is better specifically because its their group.

my point is unless youre running software that recreates models for life creation, then its not really heretical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see, Christianity and science arent really conflicting.<br />
the only controversies are the beginning of the universe, the beginning of life, and the existence of a higher being. all of which cant really be proven either way, and shouldnt be a cause for fighting.<br />
the problem comes when one group (of any kind) believes their group is better specifically because its their group.</p>
<p>my point is unless youre running software that recreates models for life creation, then its not really heretical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debaser</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Debaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Look! They trust people! Let&#039;s take advantage of their trust! Aren&#039;t we great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look! They trust people! Let&#8217;s take advantage of their trust! Aren&#8217;t we great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gi</title>
		<link>http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/2009/01/05/scijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Gi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miscellanea.wellingtongrey.net/?p=231#comment-702</guid>
		<description>@rossthefroboy

Science is modelled on doubt. Religion is modelled on faith. They conflict when religion refuses to doubt the ridiculous. Livebal religion is no problem to anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rossthefroboy</p>
<p>Science is modelled on doubt. Religion is modelled on faith. They conflict when religion refuses to doubt the ridiculous. Livebal religion is no problem to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
