True Pastafarian
November 18th, 2009

True Pastafarian

^ 12 Comments...

  1. Giles

    Nice. Silly Christians!

    RAmen!

  2. Collin

    But to believe and not believe is contradictory… Guess we’re moving up on the ‘real’ religion list!

    RAmen!

  3. Jeremy

    It’s like double-think!

    I like this, but just one question: Why’s the dude’s head red? Any particular reason?

  4. ira

    lol ~
    *touches fellow pastaferian with holy appendage*

  5. ira

    2jeremy: cuz he’s got gradient instead of brains :}

  6. admin

    @Jeremy

    Because I’m a terrible, terrible artist, I draw in stick figures. Also, all stick figures look the same, which is a problem. To try and make them look just a bit different, I give all the crazy religious people in my comics red heads. (See here & here)

    I’m open to other suggestions though, if you have any.

  7. AnonCoward23

    Another thing the Pastafarians stole from us Discordians… Maybe the Spaghetti Monster is the Greyface and not Bob after all…

  8. Gelfling

    Jeremy: It’s not like doublethink, it’s like….doublethink! :-)

  9. The One Guy

    @admin: “Crazy” religious people? I wouldn’t call the guy you’re talking to in this strip crazy. Thinking that something is made of three parts is a lot less crazy than thinking something both does and doesn’t exist. For that mater, the people in you’re second example link don’t seem to be crazy either (The guy in the first link, on the other hand definitely is).

  10. Stefford

    “a lot less crazy than thinking something both does and doesn’t exist”
    Like particles and waves?

  11. Giles

    @ Stefford – Based on evidence? Away with ya!

  12. The One Guy

    @Stefford:
    If you’re referring to light, I’ll have you know that everything is both a particle and a wave. (The larger something is the shorter the wavelength, and for macroscopic things it’s so small it makes no measurable effect, but a photon (light particle) is so small, the wavelike nature is much more pronounced.) It’s unknown exactly how this is true, but as Giles said, it’s based on experimental evidence, and there’s no reason for it NOT to be true. Lack of complete knowledge: yes, contradictory: no.
    If you’re referring to something else, please elaborate.

) Your Reply...